Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316155›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Predicting early and late neonatal mortality using machine learning models in Oman.

Sulaiman Salim Al Mashrafi, Laleh Tafakori, Mali Abdollahian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sulaiman Salim Al MashrafiSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. S3912607@student.rmit.edu.au.
Laleh TafakoriSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mali AbdollahianSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal mortality is a major issue in global health and is included in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Early neonatal deaths account for 47% of under-five mortality. Developing a dependable model to predict early neonatal mortality and recognise its related risk factors is essential for child survival and enhancing children’s health outcomes. We utilised various machine learning models to predict early and late neonatal mortality using a comprehensive secondary dataset from Oman.

methodsTen different machine learning (ML) models were used to predict early and late neonatal mortality in three distinct setups: using the original local dataset, applying the data-driven approach represented by Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address the imbalanced distribution, and implementing an algorithm-driven approach via cost-sensitive classification. A total of 2,940 de-identified local records on newborn deaths were categorised into early deaths (0–6 days) and late deaths (7–27 days) for model training and testing using a 10-fold cross-validation. Various calibration and discrimination metrics were utilised to assess the models’ performance due to the issue of an imbalanced dataset.

resultsThe analysis revealed that 71.6% of the deaths occurred during the early neonatal period (0–6 days). Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF) were the top performers across the three scenarios, with AUC-PR (Area Under Precision and Recall Curves) above 0.85 and an exemplary Brier score. However, RF Brier score was more stable across the three setups, especially with SMOTE (Brier = 0.1864), compared to the Brier score of LDA (0.2211) and LR (0.2164) indicating an effective calibration. The APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) score at 5 min was identified as the most significant predictor of early and late neonatal mortality.

conclusionThis study is one of the first to train and evaluate multiple ML algorithms under three different scenarios to predict early and late neonatal mortality and to identify associated risk factors using real data from Oman. The results indicate that RF, LDA and LR performed the best based on their discrimination and calibration performance. The findings have the potential to inform clinical decision-making and prompt timely interventions to enhance survival rates.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityMachine LearningPredictive Learning ModelsClassification AlgorithmsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOmanPrediction AlgorithmsRandom ForestEarly and late neonatal deathsMachine learningNeonatal mortalityNeonatal mortality predictionOman

Identifiers

PMID41316155
PMCPMC12771737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.