ArticleBMC public health2025
Associations between english proficiency and HPV vaccine uptake among foreign-born men and women in the United States: a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health Interview Survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisparities in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination persist among foreign-born adults in the U.S., who are up to 30% less likely than their U.S.-born counterparts to have ever received the vaccine. While HPV vaccination primarily targets adolescents, the recent expansion of eligibility to adults provides an opportunity to reach individuals who missed vaccination during adolescence. However, English often serves as a second or third language for many foreign-born adults, and limited proficiency or dialect differences may create barriers to navigating the U.S. healthcare system and accessing preventive services. Using data from the National Health Interview Survey, this study examines whether self-reported English proficiency is associated with HPV vaccine uptake among foreign-born U.S adults.
methodsWe analyzed data from the 2015-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Participants were foreign-born adults aged 18-38 years for women, and 18-36 years for men at the time of data collection (n = 5,450). The dependent variable was self-reported ever receipt of an HPV vaccine (yes/no), and the independent variable was English proficiency, dichotomized as high vs. low English proficiency. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between English proficiency and receipt of the HPV vaccine. All estimates were weighted to account for the NHIS's complex survey design.
resultsThe weighted prevalence of ever receiving the HPV vaccine was 12.2% (95% CI: 11.1-13.3) among foreign-born adults in the U.S. The overall mean age was 29.4 years (95% CI: 29.2-29.6). Among those who had received the HPV vaccine, 76.7% were female and 23.3% were male, whereas among those who had not received the vaccine, 49.9% were female and 50.1% were male (p < 0.001). We found that foreign-born individuals with low English proficiency were significantly less likely to have received the HPV vaccine than those with high proficiency (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.32-0.73) after adjusting for sex, age, marital status, citizenship status, education, geographical region of birth, insurance status, and having a usual source of care.
conclusionOur findings suggest that limited English proficiency negatively influences the receipt of HPV vaccination among foreign-born individuals in the U.S. Targeted interventions for populations in need of linguistically tailored education and interactions within healthcare systems are needed to address disparities in HPV vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.