ArticleBMC public health2025
Longitudinal changes in occupational well-being: a four-wave panel survey of employees in Switzerland and Germany.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOccupational well-being is a key element of employee health and a crucial determinant of productivity. The present exploratory study investigates longitudinal changes in work engagement and exhaustion as indicators of occupational well-being during different stages of the COVID-19 crisis among employees in Switzerland and Germany.
methodsUsing a four-wave panel design, we collected data from 2,137 participants during various stages of the pandemic from April 2020 to December 2021. We applied latent change score modeling to examine changes within groups and differences between employee groups over time.
resultsResults show that work engagement declined significantly between April and July 2020, partially recovered between July and December 2020, and then remained stable until December 2021. Multi-group analysis highlighted the importance of national context, social connections, and work flexibility as working in Switzerland, living with others, caregiving responsibilities for children, and remote work were consistently associated with higher work engagement. In contrast, exhaustion levels remained relatively stable across all time points. However, some significant differences emerged between groups, with employees in Switzerland reporting an overall lower level of exhaustion. Age-specific trends were also identified, with older employees reporting overall lower levels of exhaustion compared to younger employees across the whole measurement period.
conclusionThe study contributes to the understanding of the dynamic nature of occupational well-being during the pandemic, with implications for organizations aiming to support their employees not only in times of crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.