ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Exploring quality of death in Chinese hospice and palliative care units: a qualitative perspective from practitioners in healthcare settings.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of death (QoD) in palliative care is a critical yet understudied area of healthcare in China, shaped by complex cultural, familial, and clinical factors. As an emerging medical specialty, palliative care in China increasingly emphasises holistic and person-centred approaches. The understanding of what constitutes a good death in clinical settings however, remains largely Western-centric and is often implicitly defined within unique Chinese sociocultural contexts.
methodsIn-depth, semi-structured interviews were collected from 27 multidisciplinary end-of-life care practitioners across China, including doctors, nurses and social workers. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to explore the key components of good QoD and the factors influencing it within Chinese hospice and palliative care settings. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) to ensure rigour and transparency.
resultsThree themes emerged: (1) providing care with dignity through relationships, balancing respect for patients with cultural expectations and medical realities; (2) enhancing communication within family dynamics, involving indirect communication styles, managing family conflicts, and balancing transparency with cultural norms; and (3) negotiating intergenerational dilemmas, where generational differences in attitudes toward death and dying create tensions in care decisions. These findings reveal the challenges that practitioners may face in respecting patient autonomy while addressing family-centred values and medicalised norms.
conclusionThe study highlights the importance of improving communication about death and dying, promoting public education on end-of-life care, and tailoring palliative services to integrate Western clinical approaches with traditional Chinese family-centric values to enhance QoD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.