Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41316131›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Exploring quality of death in Chinese hospice and palliative care units: a qualitative perspective from practitioners in healthcare settings.

Mingming Cheng, Yuwen Cheng, Chao Fang, Alastair Comery, Fei Fang, John Troyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingming Cheng *School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, No.99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, 200444, China. chengmmthu@163.com.
Yuwen Cheng *Institution of Education, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Chao FangCentre for Ageing and the Life Course, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZR, UK. chao.fang@liverpool.ac.uk.
Alastair ComeryCentre for Death and Society, Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Fei FangSchool of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, No.99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, 200444, China. fionafang0412@hotmail.com.
John TroyerCentre for Death and Society, Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality of death (QoD) in palliative care is a critical yet understudied area of healthcare in China, shaped by complex cultural, familial, and clinical factors. As an emerging medical specialty, palliative care in China increasingly emphasises holistic and person-centred approaches. The understanding of what constitutes a good death in clinical settings however, remains largely Western-centric and is often implicitly defined within unique Chinese sociocultural contexts.

methodsIn-depth, semi-structured interviews were collected from 27 multidisciplinary end-of-life care practitioners across China, including doctors, nurses and social workers. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to explore the key components of good QoD and the factors influencing it within Chinese hospice and palliative care settings. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) to ensure rigour and transparency.

resultsThree themes emerged: (1) providing care with dignity through relationships, balancing respect for patients with cultural expectations and medical realities; (2) enhancing communication within family dynamics, involving indirect communication styles, managing family conflicts, and balancing transparency with cultural norms; and (3) negotiating intergenerational dilemmas, where generational differences in attitudes toward death and dying create tensions in care decisions. These findings reveal the challenges that practitioners may face in respecting patient autonomy while addressing family-centred values and medicalised norms.

conclusionThe study highlights the importance of improving communication about death and dying, promoting public education on end-of-life care, and tailoring palliative services to integrate Western clinical approaches with traditional Chinese family-centric values to enhance QoD.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHospice CarePalliative CareQuality of Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to DeathChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCare cultureFamilismHealthcare practitionersHospice and palliativeQualitative studyQuality of death

Identifiers

PMID41316131
PMCPMC12661895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.