ArticleBMC neurology2025
Sudanese physicians' insights on managing stroke during Sudan's war 2024.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a major public health burden, with high mortality and long-term disability, particularly in low-resource and conflict-affected settings. In Sudan, the ongoing armed conflict since April 2023 has critically impacted healthcare delivery, yet its effects on stroke care remain underexplored.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 431 physicians managing stroke cases during the 2024 Sudan conflict. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire distributed via medical networks. Descriptive statistics summarized the findings, and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed associations.
resultsMost respondents were general practitioners (49.2%), with over 80% having ≤ 5 years' experience and working in public hospitals. Nearly 49% reported significantly worsened stroke outcomes since the war, and 58% noted increases in both incidence and severity. Key barriers included delayed hospital arrival (38.5%), lack of neuroimaging (28.8%), and financial constraints. Over 70% cited shortages in supplies; rehabilitation was disrupted by facility loss, displacement, and inadequate follow-up. Complications such as recurrent strokes (57.5%) and infections (53.4%) were common. No significant associations were found between demographic factors and responses patterns to stroke management services.
conclusionThe war has led to a systemic collapse in stroke management in Sudan. A coordinated response is urgently needed to address diagnostic limitations, security risks, and rehabilitation gaps. Strengthening training, infrastructure, and resource delivery must be prioritized in future recovery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.