ArticleBMC public health2025
Developing predictive models for COVID-19 positive tests based on the XGBoost and random forest algorithms with internet search data.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough strategies for COVID-19 have shifted towards normalized measures globally, establishing predictive models based on Internet search data remains crucial for swiftly controlling and preventing future outbreaks. This study aims to utilize Internet search data for early epidemic surveillance and warning.
methodsWe collected the daily number of COVID-19 positive tests and the daily Baidu Search Index (BSI) of COVID-19 related keywords. First, we screened keywords with a maximum correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9 by time-lagged correlation analysis. Then, we used the original and lagged BSI to construct XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) models for short-term prediction of the COVID-19, respectively. Next, we selected top 5 important predictors according to the importance gain in XGBoost model and constructed a comprehensive search index (CSI) weighted by the importance gain. Finally, we used the distributed lagged nonlinear model (DLNM) to evaluate the relationship between the CSI and the number of COVID-19 positive tests.
resultsWe identified 20 keywords had a maximum correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9 with lag days of 1-10 days. Then, we found that the predictive performance of the XGBoost models was better than that of the RF models. And XGBoost models using lagged BSI (compared to original BSI) had a better predictive performance for forecasting 3 days, with an RMSE of 803.85 and a MAPE of 9.96%. Finally, we observed that the CSI was statistically associated with the number of COVID-19 positive tests, with the maximum relative risks (RR) at lags of 0, 3, 5, and 7 days being 2.18 (95%CI 1.60-2.97), 1.94 (95%CI 1.10-3.43), 1.86 (95%CI 1.01-3.44), and 2.03 (95%CI 1.00-4.11), respectively.
conclusionsThe XGBoost model with the lagged BSI can predict COVID-19 epidemics, which make it a powerful addition to the traditional surveillance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.