ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Perspectives of obstetricians and midwives on the preference for caesarean deliveries: a qualitative exploration in Andhra Pradesh, India.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare providers' perspectives on implementing evidence-based practice guidelines to reduce cesarean section rates: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCaesarean section rates in Andhra Pradesh increased to 42.4% in 2019-21, far above the WHO-recommended 10-15% level. Although the c-sections are life-saving when medically necessary, their overuse is a cause of concern for maternal health outcomes and increased health expenditure. The present study aims to understand the perceptions of obstetricians and midwives on the rising trend of preference for caesarean sections in the selected districts of Andhra Pradesh. MATERIALS AND
methodsA phenomenological qualitative research design was adopted for this study, conducted among four districts of Andhra Pradesh: two with high C-section rates (Visakhapatnam, Krishna) and two with low C-section rates (Anantapur, Chittoor). Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with eight obstetricians and eight midwives selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim, and Braun & Clarke's thematic analysis framework was employed to generate the themes and sub-themes.
resultsThematic analysis of the obtained data revealed four major themes influencing the preference for caesarean sections, which included: Sociocultural and psychological determinants, including tokophobia, family pressures, and beliefs about auspicious dates of birth; followed by Maternal and lifestyle determinants, including sedentary behaviours that affect physiological capacity for vaginal delivery and mothers' decisions based on convenience. In addition, Healthcare system factors, including time, medico-legal considerations, staffing issues, and Medical indications for C-sections, including high-risk pregnancy and labour complications. These results suggest that the decision to conduct c-sections was influenced not only by medical indications but also by societal, systemic, and individual-level factors.
conclusionThe study highlights that while medical indications are a valid basis for conducting c-sections, a substantial proportion of c-sections are happening due to the influence of non-clinical factors such as socio-cultural beliefs, maternal preferences, systemic challenges and provider convenience. The findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework, with standard clinical protocols, periodic audits, and maternal education, to reduce unnecessary c-sections in Andhra Pradesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.