ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
A critical case of anaphylaxis triggered by exercise in a pediatric asthma patient.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA 13-year-old boy with well-controlled asthma presented with acute respiratory distress, generalized urticaria, and cyanosis after playing soccer, raising concerns for food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) or exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIA). The patient initially underwent evaluation at a nearby clinic and was later admitted to the hospital where the initial management involved intubation and intensive resuscitation after a preliminary diagnosis of anaphylaxis. CASE PRESENTATION: At the presentation in the hospital, the patient had severe neurological impairment with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3/15. On physical examination, abnormalities included hypotension, tachycardia, fever, and severe hypoxemia, with a SpO2 of 99%. The neurological examination was positive for dilated pupils and absent deep tendon reflexes. Laboratory results showed significant metabolic derangements, elevated liver enzymes, and markedly elevated lactate levels. The patient received fluid resuscitation, neuroprotection, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and antiepileptic treatment. CT scan was positive for cerebral edema and diffuse hypoxia. Despite maximum medical therapy, including sedation and inotropic support, the patient eventually progressed to evidence of brain death three days after admission.
conclusionThe case illustrates the difficulty of managing severe anaphylactic reactions in an asthmatic patient after playing soccer, resulting in neurological sequelae. It emphasizes the necessity of further research on prevention measures and guidelines for managing such a case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.