Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315967›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Building self-determination through the lens of the Circle of Courage: a qualitative evaluation of a social prescribing program for children and youth in Canada.

Caitlin Muhl, Valeria Dimitrova, Ellen Song, Isobel Fishman, Ashley Buffone, Samantha Kempe, Nicole Racine, Susan Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caitlin MuhlVanier Social Pediatric Hub, Ottawa, ON, Canada. caitlin.muhl@queensu.ca.
Valeria DimitrovaFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ellen SongFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Isobel FishmanFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ashley BuffoneFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Samantha KempeFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicole RacineFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Susan BennettVanier Social Pediatric Hub, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial prescribing is gaining traction globally as a means to achieve global goals for health and wellbeing. In 2023, we launched a social prescribing program in a comprehensive, pediatric integrated health and social service hub in an underserved inner city neighbourhood in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The program targeted children and youth with poor social health, including social isolation and loneliness. Program participants were paired with a connector, who worked with them to explore their individual needs, strengths, and interests. Together, they created a social prescription for a child and youth-friendly community activity. The connector then provided a supported referral to aid the program participant in successfully completing their social prescription. The program was piloted at the hub over a period of ten months, during which time a program evaluation took place. As part of our program evaluation, we sought to explore the concept of self-determination, which is thought to be one of the guiding principles of social prescribing. While self-determination has been explored in adult social prescribing, it has not yet been examined in child and youth social prescribing. Thus, the aim of this evaluation was to explore the ways in which our social prescribing program may foster self-determination in children and youth.

methodsA qualitative descriptive design was employed. Between November 2023 and February 2024, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 program participants and 30 caregivers at the six-month mark of enrollment in the program. Interview questions centered around program participants' and caregivers' experiences of the program. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. Using the Circle of Courage - a child and youth-focused theory on self-determination, we conducted deductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe findings indicated that the program may foster self-determination through each component of the Circle of Courage: (1) Independence: The child's free will is nurtured by increased responsibility; (2) Belonging: The universal longing for human bonds is nurtured by relationships of trust; (3) Mastery: The child's inborn thirst for learning is nurtured; and (4) Generosity: The child's character is nurtured by concern for others.

conclusionThis evaluation has shed light on the ways in which social prescribing may foster self-determination in children and youth. The Circle of Courage may be a useful framework to explore the impact of other child and youth social prescribing programs.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySocial WorkAdolescentChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLonelinessMaleOntarioProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSocial IsolationSocial PrescribingChildren and youthSelf-determinationSocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID41315967
PMCPMC12664157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.