ReviewClinical proteomics2025
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.
Review in Clinical proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of routine FFPE CNS tumor tissue complements genomic and epigenomic characterization.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- From Machine Learning-Enhanced Proteomics to a Validated Diagnostic Model: A Pipeline for Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery via Independent and Transcriptomic Corroboration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Method-Defined Signals to Reference Measurement Procedures: Two Decades of Mass Spectrometry-Based ProGRP Quantification.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Article
- From Genes to Proteins: The Indispensable Role of Proteogenomics in Advancing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Theory to Practice: Which Biomarkers Are Ready for Predicting Response in Advanced HCC?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- [Proteomics and glycomics in pathology : Potential of autopsy and FFPE tissue for diagnostics and research].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Targeted Quantitative Analysis of Specific Proteins in Cytosolic, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Fractions Using PRM.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue proteomics has emerged as a promising approach for precision medicine, offering access to vast clinical archives. Despite technological advances enabling identification of thousands of proteins from FFPE samples, no proteomic diagnostic tests based on FFPE tissues have achieved regulatory approval for clinical diagnostics, raising fundamental questions about the translational viability of this approach. MAIN BODY: This review critically evaluates the realistic barriers preventing clinical translation of FFPE proteomics and identifies targeted applications with genuine promise for near-term implementation. We demonstrate that while comprehensive discovery-based proteomics faces insurmountable challenges including validation failure rates exceeding 90%, targeted proteomic strategies focused on specific clinical questions show substantially greater potential. Current implementation barriers extend beyond technical limitations to encompass economic constraints (5-10-fold higher costs than immunohistochemistry), regulatory uncertainties, and fundamental incompatibilities with clinical laboratory workflows. The persistent emphasis on increasingly complex analytical platforms may represent misallocated resources given unresolved standardization and validation challenges.
conclusionStrategic redirection toward targeted proteomic applications addressing specific diagnostic needs, rather than comprehensive molecular profiling, offers the most viable pathway for clinical translation. Success will require prioritizing applications where FFPE proteomics provides unique, actionable information that justifies its complexity and cost relative to established methodologies. We propose specific criteria for identifying high-impact applications and outline a pragmatic roadmap for achieving clinical implementation within realistic timeframes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.