ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Oral urease rapid test serve as an effective complement to the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection through urea breath test.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The urea breath test (UBT) is the clinic’s most popular and accurate non-invasive diagnostic method for Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. Yet, it is time-consuming and unavailable to some individuals. The oral rapid urease test (RUT) is an emerging non-invasive convenience method but lacks clinical data support. A double-center, double-blind, methodological comparative design experiment is invited to evaluate the consistency of the oral RUT with UBT. 247 participants were enrolled. Their Dental plaque and tongue coating samples were collected, blind and tested with RUT. The significant association between the RUT and UBT was analyzed. The oral RUT showed a high level of agreement with the UBT. The sensitivity of the test reagent was 98.63% (95% CI: 92.64%, 99.76%), and the specificity was 96.34% (95% CI: 92.25%, 98.31%). The overall conformity rate was 97.05% (95% CI: 94.03%, 98.56%). The positive predictive value was 92.31%, and the negative predictive value was 99.37%. The positive likelihood ratio was 26.96, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.01. The Kappa value was 0.97. The efficacy of oral RUT for HP infection diagnosis is extremely consistent with the UBT.Trial registrationClinical trial of rapid test paper (chemical reaction method) for Helicobacter pylori (NO.ChiCTR2500097395), Registration Date2025.02.19.Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.