ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Agronomic performance and yield stability of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in multi-environment trials.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe selection of stable, high-yielding pea genotypes is crucial for sustaining production under changing climate conditions. Twenty multi-environment trials (10 locations x 2 years) were conducted to evaluate 11 genotypes during the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 growing seasons in southern China.
resultsThe Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) pooled analysis revealed that environmental effects accounted for the largest proportion of total variation (59.62%), followed by genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) at 30.11%. The factor analysis revealed that plant height, first pod height, number of nodes on the main stem, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, and number of nodes containing pods were the best multi-traits that significantly contributed to high yields. Cluster analysis identified five superior genotypes - Jingwan 8, Yuwan 6, Yunwan 116, 20205, and Suwan 8, with Yunwan 116 also showing disease resistance. The genotype main effects plus GEI (GGE) biplot identified Kunming and Xinxiang locations as the most effective environments for differentiating the genotypes, and Jingwan 8 as the ideal genotype for high yield and stability, particularly in these locations. Further, Yuwan 6 and 20205 also showed wide adaptability across environments.
conclusionsJingwan 8, Yuwan 6, and 20205 pea genotypes are recommended for large-scale cultivation due to their high yield and broad adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.