ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Quantitative evaluation of recruitment strategies in a cluster-randomized trial: segmented regression and cost analysis from the AOK-Family + study.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A CFIR-Guided Qualitative Process Evaluation of a Health Insurance-Based Lifestyle Counseling Intervention During Pregnancy in Germany.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecruitment of participants for preventive health intervention studies remains a significant challenge: Approximately 19% of studies are discontinued due to insufficient participant numbers, and one in three extends its recruitment period. This study aimed to examine the impact of recruiting measures on the recruitment rate over time and to describe costs of these strategies to inform future study planning and optimize resource allocation.
methodsA cluster-randomized controlled trial ("AOK-Family+" study) was conducted from April 2023 to June 2024 in southwestern Germany. The intervention focused on reducing lifestyle-related risk factors (LRRFs) among pregnant women and women planning a pregnancy. Analog recruitment strategies included e.g., printed magazines, flyers and digital recruitment strategies included e.g. social media ads, influencer marketing. For 255 interested women, contact details, recruitment source, and participation status were documented and analyzed. A segmented linear regression analysis was used to identify turning points in application trends. Direct costs were calculated based on internal project budget tracking.
resultsThe targeted sample size was not reached despite substantial investment in recruitment measures. The highest number of applications resulted from analog strategies-especially printed AOK magazines (35.5%)-followed by influencer marketing (23.6%). The segmented linear regression analysis identified three significant increases in application rates, the first coinciding with the magazine distribution and the second with the influencer marketing on Instagram. Social media marketing showed a short-lived effect, with application rates dropping immediately after posts ended. Total costs amounted to 99.334 € equaling 389,54€ per application and 534,05€ per actually enrolled participant.
conclusionHealth magazines proved to be the most cost-efficient and sustainable recruitment strategy. Influencer marketing led to high reach and initial spikes in engagement but had limited long-term impact. While digital measures generated many clicks, only a small fraction translated into study participation-indicating a pronounced intention-behavior gap and procedural barriers in the enrolment process. For future studies, a mixed-methods recruitment strategy is recommended combining wide digital outreach with personalized, trust-based communication, ideally through healthcare professionals such as gynecologists and midwives, to reach women in early pregnancy and reduce participation barriers.
trial registrationThe German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00027804. Registered on 2022/01/12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.