Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315914›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Assembly and comparative analysis of chromosomal mitochondrial genomes in multiple Medicago species.

Ruifeng Yang, Mengyue Wang, Mingliang Wang, Jun Li, Jinglong Li, Chien-Hsun Huang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheGenes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitogenome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruifeng YangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Mengyue WangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Mingliang WangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Jun LiState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Jinglong LiState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China. ljl6528@163.com.
Chien-Hsun HuangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Inner Mongolia Engineering Technology Research Center of Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010000, China. chhuang1981@139.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270232;31970224;31770242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedicago is an economically important forage genus widely distributed across China, yet its mitochondrial genomes remain poorly understood. Comprehensive characterization of mitochondrial genome structure, function, and evolution is crucial for elucidating plant biological mechanisms, improving germplasm utilization, and advancing molecular breeding.

resultsWe assembled and compared the mitochondrial genomes of eight Medicago species, including six newly sequenced genomes. Five species contained typical single circular mitochondrial genomes, whereas M. falcata, M. platycarpos, and M. sativa displayed complex multipartite circular conformations. Genome sizes ranged from 281,240 to 356,577 bp, with 55-74 functional genes. Repeat analysis identified 141 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 76 tandem repeats (TSRs), largely composed of A/T-rich mononucleotide motifs, while dispersed repeats were mainly 30-49 bp in length. Codon usage showed a strong A/T bias and a preference for leucine, serine, and isoleucine. RNA editing events were predominantly C-to-U substitutions, primarily occurring at the first and second codon positions. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on 31 shared mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs) strongly supported the monophyly of Medicago and recovered interspecific relationships consistent with previous chloroplast and nuclear genome studies. Most PCGs were under purifying selection, while a few, such as matR, exhibited signatures of positive selection, suggesting lineage-specific adaptive evolution.

conclusionsThis study expands the mitochondrial genomic resources of Medicago and provides new insights into its structural evolution and phylogenetic relationships, offering a valuable foundation for evolutionary and functional studies in Fabaceae.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantGenome, MitochondrialGenome, PlantMedicagoEvolution, MolecularMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyRNA EditingComparative analysisGenome rearrangementsMedicagoMitochondrial genomePhylogenetic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41315914
PMCPMC12664221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.