ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between health literacy and medication adherence in patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between social determinants and poor hypertension treatment adherence among middle-aged and older people in rural China: a hospital-based case‒control study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Association of Health Literacy with Sociodemographic Factors and Medication Adherence Among Primary Health Care Users in Montenegro.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients with osteomyelitis: a cross-sectional study using structural equation modeling.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between religious health fatalism, medication adherence, and health literacy among patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- AI-generated explanations in kidney transplantation: accuracy vs. readability and implications for patient education.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the levels of medication adherence and health literacy among patients with hypertension at a family health center in eastern Türkiye. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted in a family health center with 200 hypertensive patients (≥ 18 years). Data were collected using the "Patient Identification Form", the "Health Literacy Scale", and the "Short Drug Questionnaire". The mean score on the Health Literacy Scale was 81.83 ± 13.73, indicating above-average health literacy. The mean score on the Short Drug Questionnaire was 0.62 ± 0.60, with 40.5% of patients showing nonadherence with their medications. Importantly, 40.5% of participants scored ≥ 1 on the BMQ, indicating a clinically meaningful risk of non-adherence in almost half of the sample. The most common reasons for nonadherence were diet (30.5%) and personal beliefs (14.5%). A moderate positive correlation was found between health literacy and medication adherence (r = 0.545, p = 0.023). In the regression analysis, health literacy significantly predicted medication adherence (β = 0.545, p < 0.05), explaining 29.7% of the variance in adherence (R²= 0.297). Participants with higher education, income, and prior disease education showed better medication adherence and higher health literacy scores (p < 0.05). Patients' medication adherence improved as their health literacy levels increased. These findings highlight the importance of enhancing health literacy to promote better medication adherence in hypertensive individuals. Nurses should implement strategies such as personalized education, effective communication, and regular follow-up to increase patients' health literacy and ensure consistent medication adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.