Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315833›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Investigation of the effects of plant extracts containing allelopathic compounds as natural herbicides for controlling yellow-thorn and wild safflower in chickpea crops.

Sadegh Jalilian, Ahmad Ghanbari, Mohammad Reza Asgharipour, Alireza Bagheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sadegh JalilianUnit of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
Ahmad GhanbariUnit of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. drghanbari@uoz.ac.ir.
Mohammad Reza AsgharipourUnit of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. m_asgharipour@uoz.ac.ir.
Alireza BagheriDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of plant extracts containing inhibitory compounds and the evaluation of their toxic effects on weeds can contribute to reducing the reliance on chemical herbicides. This study aimed to investigate the effects of natural herbicide treatments derived from plant extracts containing allelochemical compounds as natural herbicides for controlling yellow-thorn (Picnomon acarna) and wild safflower (Carthamus oxyacantha) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) fields during the cropping seasons of 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. In both years, the experimental treatments included ethanolic extracts of chamomile (Anthemis odontostephana Boiss.) at 50 g L⁻¹, artichoke (Gundelia tournefortii L.) at 100 g L⁻¹, and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) shells at 100 g L⁻¹, applied via foliar spray; pelargonic acid; the herbicide Challenge, and a control (distilled water). The results indicated that, among the applied treatments, chamomile extract (CE) presented the highest toxicity to both weed species. Compared with the control, the CE significantly reduced weed biomass by 55.53% and increased chickpea biomass by 73.81%. The combined data analysis revealed that the greatest inhibition of yellow-thorn and wild safflower growth was observed after treatment with CE in the first year, with inhibition rates of 70.47% and 82.83%, respectively. In the second year, yellow-thorn and wild safflower treated with CE presented a reduction in greenness of 55.36% and 53.44%, respectively, compared with the control in the same year, indicating the phytotoxic effect of the extract. Notably, the stomatal conductance of yellow-thorn and wild safflower treated with CE in the second year decreased by 37.40% and 37.85%, respectively, compared with that of the untreated control in the same year. The yellow-thorn plants in the pelargonic acid and control treatments in the first year presented the lowest chlorophyll fluorescence, which was 18.82% lower than that in the control in the second year. Additionally, CE treatment in the second year resulted in a 41.86% reduction in the chlorophyll fluorescence of wild safflower compared with that of the control in the first year. Gas chromatography‒mass spectrometry (GC‒MS) analysis of the volatile fraction (essential oil) of CE revealed 21 compounds, with terpenoids being the primary active components. The compounds myrtenyl acetate, decanoic acid, spathulenol, and caryophyllene oxide were the most abundant constituents of the essential oil fraction. The significant inhibitory and herbicidal activity observed in chamomile can be attributed to myrtenyl acetate. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the substantial inhibitory effects of CE on yellow-thorn and wild safflower, which may be utilized for the development of environmentally friendly plant-based herbicides. Terpenoids, notably myrtenyl acetate (20.37%) with its herbicidal effects, along with decanoic acid (9.85%), spathulenol (7.99%), and caryophyllene oxide (5.12%), were confirmed in the volatile fraction of the CE due to their bioactive properties.

Indexed as

CicerHerbicidesPheromonesPlant ExtractsAllelopathyCarthamus tinctoriusCrops, AgriculturalPlant WeedsHerbicidesPheromonesPlant ExtractsArtichokeChamomile extractGreennessInhibitionMyrtenyl acetatePelargonic acid

Identifiers

PMID41315833
PMCPMC12669724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.