Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ad hoc bandwidth requests and power conservation in 5G wireless networks with tiny cells.

A Rajesh, C V Ravikumar, S Fouziya Sulthana, Tai-Hoon Kim, T Shankar, A Srinivasulu, Torki Altameem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A RajeshSASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
C V RavikumarVellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
S Fouziya SulthanaSRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Tai-Hoon KimSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Yeosu Campus, Chonnam National University, 50 Daehak-Ro, Yeosusi, Jeollanam-Do, 59626, South Korea. taihoonn@chonnam.ac.kr.
T ShankarVellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
A SrinivasuluDatascience Research Laboratory, Bluecrest University, Monrovia, Liberia. srinu.asadi@gmail.com.
Torki AltameemComputer Science and Engineering Department, College of Applied Studies, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

: This work was supported by the Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2025-0926) and by the ongoing Research funding Program (ORF-2025-503), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2025-0926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contention-based bandwidth request and power management mechanisms aim to improve the spectral efficiency and power consumption in Fifth Generation (5G) wireless networks to support massive Internet of Things (IoT) devices. However, when these mechanisms as combined together, they exhibit increased access delay with contention bandwidth request and response delay during power management. This tradeoff is due to the improper selection of contention window during backoff mechanism, and the duration and position of listen interval during power management. Here, the suitability of message and code-based mechanism for single hop and two-hop 5G wireless relay networks has been investigated. In single hop network, the devices set their contention window either by message or code based base station assisted backoff along with combined cyclic binary exponent power saving mechanism. In two-hop wireless network, devices set their contention window by multi-layered bandwidth request with combined power saving class mechanism. Simulations are carried out under high mobility conditions to validate the proposed mechanisms.

Indexed as

5G NetworkBandwidth RequestData link controlPower SavingSmall-cell Network

Identifiers

PMID41315831
PMCPMC12663130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.