Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

National assessment of transit electrification in Canada: infrastructure costs, energy demand, and greenhouse gas reduction potential.

Hatem Abdelaty, Moataz Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hatem AbdelatyDepartment of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Moataz MohamedDepartment of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. mmohame@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1345-7240

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2025-05957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Battery electric buses (BEBs) offer a scalable solution for decarbonizing public transit; however, comprehensive national-level assessments remain limited. This study presents the first bottom-up evaluation of BEB adoption across Canada, using open-source data from 102 transit providers. We quantify fleet requirements, infrastructure needs, electricity demand, and the cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions under a fully electrified bus transit system. Our analysis indicates a required 17% increase in fleet size and an additional 1.255 TWh of electricity annually, representing just 0.20% of Canada's total generation. GHG emissions would decline by over 92% to approximately 130,000 tonnes annually, with the social cost of carbon falling by a similar margin (92.68%). These findings demonstrate that nationwide BEB deployment is technically feasible, economically manageable, and environmentally impactful. This study offers reproducible, open-source-based, critical evidence to guide energy planning, policy decisions, and investments in a sustainable, zero-emission transit future.

Indexed as

Battery electric busesEnergy, emission, and cost outlookNational assessmentTransit electrification

Identifiers

PMID41315758
PMCPMC12753729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.