ArticleScientific reports2025
The risk analysis of unplanned tracheal intubation after radical esophagectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer patients often face various challenges in the perioperative period, and unplanned tracheal intubation is a serious complication that can significantly impact patient outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the risk factors for reintubation in esophageal cancer patients after surgery. A retrospective study was carried out on esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in 2019. Data on patient demographics, surgical details, and anesthesia techniques were collected. We employed logistic regression analysis to explore the factors associated with the occurrence of unplanned tracheal intubation. The study encompassed a total of 463 patients. 7.8% (36/463) of the enrolled patients encountered unplanned reintubation during the postoperative phase. Notably, respiratory failure (9/49, 18.4%) and pulmonary infection (8/49, 16.3%) emerged as the primary drivers prompting patients to undergo reintubation in the postoperative period. The results of multivariable logistic analysis indicated that analgesic technique was the independent risk factor for reintubation and compared with general anesthesia (GA) combined with epidural anesthesia, GA combined with nerve block was significantly associated with reintubation. This study analyzed the incidence of unplanned tracheal intubation in esophageal cancer patients after surgery and determined the key independent risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.