ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Enhancing clinical documentation with voice processing and large language models: a study on the LAOS system.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The evolving physician-AI relationship: a five-tier framework for integrating intelligent systems into clinical practice and medical education.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Does Recording Hardware Matter for Clinical Speech Recognition? Evaluating ASR Performance Across Consumer Devices.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automatic Speech Recognition in Healthcare in the Post-LLM Era: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing volume of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has enhanced patient care quality but significantly increased the cognitive workload on clinicians, particularly in ophthalmology where specialists handle 1.6 times more patient consultations than other specialties. This study introduces the "LLM-based Auxiliary Ophthalmic System (LAOS)," an integrated framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) and audio processing to improve clinical documentation accuracy and efficiency. LAOS combines voice recognition with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to convert clinical conversations into structured documentation while dynamically retrieving relevant medical knowledge. The system was evaluated across three critical documentation tasks: Admission Reports, Surgery Records, and Discharge Summaries. Through both quantitative metrics (BLEU, ROUGE-L, BERT Score) and clinical validation by board-certified physicians, LAOS demonstrated significant improvements in documentation completeness, accuracy, and efficiency. While challenges remain in balancing comprehensiveness with conciseness, this research highlights the potential of speech-enabled LLM systems to alleviate physician burnout, enhance documentation quality, and improve healthcare delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.