ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning-based intelligent curriculum system for enhancing public music education: a case study across three universities in Southwest China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive and skill acquisition trajectories in school-based music education: evidence from Chinese classrooms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Responding to national aesthetic education reforms, this study introduces a deep learning-driven platform to enhance public music education in Southwest China's universities. Utilizing LSTM and Transformer models, the system analyzes real-time student learning, predicts mastery trends, and delivers personalized feedback via a cloud-based interface. A semester-long experiment across Guizhou Minzu University, Guizhou University, and Xichang University compared three groups: traditional instruction, MOOC-based hybrid teaching, and AI-enhanced personalized learning. The AI group achieved 32% higher post-test mastery scores, with predictive models maintaining high accuracy (RMSE < 0.15). The platform supports adaptive assessments, intelligent feedback, and instructional decision-making, offering a scalable solution for AI integration in arts education, particularly in culturally diverse, data-scarce settings. This work informs policymakers and developers aiming to modernize aesthetic education through advanced computing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.