ArticleScientific reports2025
Fear of missing out predicts loneliness through psychological and social pathways among doctoral students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phubbing and Loneliness in the Digital Age: A Daily Diary Study on the Mediating Role of Fear of Missing Out.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness is a growing concern among doctoral students, yet limited research has examined digital-age stressors as potential risk factors. Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) may heighten loneliness by fostering constant social comparison and online vigilance, which reduce authentic social engagement and amplify feelings of exclusion. While FoMO has been linked to emotional distress in younger student groups, its psychological and social mechanisms in doctoral education remain underexplored. This study examines whether Sense of Coherence (SoC) and Social Connectedness (SC), two protective factors against loneliness, mediate the FoMO-loneliness relationship. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 626 doctoral students (51.4% male, 48.6% female; mean age = 28.6 years, SD = 3.2) from public and private universities in Putian, China. Participants completed validated self-report measures of FoMO, SoC, SC, and loneliness. Data were analyzed using correlation and parallel mediation analysis via PROCESS Macro (Model 4), controlling for age and gender. The results indicated that FoMO was positively associated with loneliness and negatively associated with both SoC and SC. Both SoC and SC significantly predicted lower loneliness. Parallel mediation analysis confirmed significant indirect effects of FoMO on loneliness through both mediators, with the path through SC being slightly stronger. All scales demonstrated strong internal consistency, and model fit indices supported construct validity. The findings suggested that loneliness among doctoral students is shaped not only by external digital influences such as FoMO but also by internal psychological resources and social integration. To address loneliness in doctoral education, targeted interventions should aim to reduce FoMO-related stress, strengthen students' SoC, and foster meaningful peer relationships within academic environments. Doctoral training programs should consider embedding structured peer support, resilience-building activities, and digital wellness education as part of broader efforts to support student well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.