ArticleScientific reports2025
In vitro phytochemical and biological evaluation of hydroethanolic extract of Anchomanes difformis In Togo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of antibacterial and antioxidant properties as well as phytochemical compositions of Moringa oleifera gum, flower, and fruit and Elaeocarpus augustifolius leaf and bark, synergistic with Pleurotus membranaceus.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing proliferation of strains that are multidrug-resistant to conventional antibiotics has created a pressing need to explore alternative bioactive compounds. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of different organs of Anchomanes difformis, a medicinal plant widely used in the traditional pharmacopoeia of West Africa, against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Candida albicans. Total hydroethanolic extracts from the leaves, bulbs, and rhizomes were obtained by maceration. The phytochemical composition of the extracts was assessed qualitatively using standard staining techniques to identify major secondary metabolite groups. Total flavonoid content was quantified spectrophotometrically. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using two complementary methods: the phosphomolybdate reduction assay and the FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power) test. In vitro antimicrobial activity was assessed by solid diffusion methods (well and disk diffusion assays). The highest hydroethanolic extraction yield was recorded for the leaf bark extract of A. difformis (9.47%). Phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, coumarins, and reducing sugars. The bulb extract exhibited the highest total flavonoid content (33.78 µg R Eq /mg DE). The leaf extract demonstrated strong in vitro antioxidant potential, with 37.79 AA Eq /g DE and 270.50 µmol FeSO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.