Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315604›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2025

Reassessing neolithic subsistence in Northern Italy through a critical review and new evidence from Molino Casarotto.

Francesco Breglia, Vito Giuseppe Prillo, Marta Dal Corso, Maria Sofia Manfrin, Silvia D'Aquino, Federico Polisca, Luigi Germinario, Giorgio Piazzalunga, Paola Salzani, Cristiano Nicosia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco BregliaDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, 35131, Padua, Italy. francesco.breglia@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6975-0561
Vito Giuseppe PrilloDipartimento di Beni Culturali, Università di Padova, 35139, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-0255
Marta Dal CorsoDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, 35131, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-0613
Maria Sofia ManfrinDipartimento di Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Laboratorio di Preistoria, Protostoria ed Ecologia Preistorica, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20141, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-5975-5611
Silvia D'AquinoDipartimento di Beni Culturali, Università di Padova, 35139, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-7886-7586
Federico PoliscaDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, 35131, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-9987
Luigi GerminarioDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, 35131, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3879-3689
Giorgio PiazzalungaDipartimento di Beni Culturali, Università di Padova, 35139, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-1263-4897
Paola SalzaniSoprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per le province di Verona, Rovigo e Vicenza, 37121, Verona, Italy.
Cristiano NicosiaDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, 35131, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4716-8893

Funding

European Research Council 101001839 (GEODAP)Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca FARE (DIANE)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper delves into the intricate nature of neolithic subsistence economies in northern Italy by providing a comprehensive overview of all previously edited data, quantitatively compared, including plant macroremains, faunal remains, and aquatic resources. Additionally, it introduces new findings from the site of Molino Casarotto, recently investigated as part of the ERC CoG GEODAP project, through an interdisciplinary approach that combines carpological analysis, phytolith analysis, and archaeozoological studies of both terrestrial and aquatic fauna. This wetland settlement, with material culture fully representative of the middle neolithic Square-Mouthed Pottery (SMP) culture, showcases an economy primarily based on hunting, fishing, gathering molluscs and wild fruits, with water chestnut serving as the staple food. The rare presence of bone remains from domestic animals and a few cereal grains indicates access to food from a agro-pastoral economy. However, the absence of chaff remains, confirmed by phytolith analysis, suggests that cereal cultivation and processing did not occur on site. These findings, within the broader context of the cultural and environmental diversity of the northern Italian Neolithic, challenge the rigidity of concepts often used to describe Neolithization processes. The emerging picture is non-linear and complex, both chronologically and geographically, with local peculiarities that push to abandon a dichotomous view of foraging versus agricultural economy.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyAgricultureAnimalsFossilsHistory, AncientHumansItalyWetlandsForagingNeolithicSquared-Mouthed potterySubsistence strategyWild plants, fishing

Identifiers

PMID41315604
PMCPMC12738701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.