ReviewScientific reports2025
Reassessing neolithic subsistence in Northern Italy through a critical review and new evidence from Molino Casarotto.
Review in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cooking, cleaning, and tossing: high-resolution analysis of domestic activities at the Mid-Neolithic site of Molino Casarotto (Vicenza, NE Italy).Archaeological and anthropological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper delves into the intricate nature of neolithic subsistence economies in northern Italy by providing a comprehensive overview of all previously edited data, quantitatively compared, including plant macroremains, faunal remains, and aquatic resources. Additionally, it introduces new findings from the site of Molino Casarotto, recently investigated as part of the ERC CoG GEODAP project, through an interdisciplinary approach that combines carpological analysis, phytolith analysis, and archaeozoological studies of both terrestrial and aquatic fauna. This wetland settlement, with material culture fully representative of the middle neolithic Square-Mouthed Pottery (SMP) culture, showcases an economy primarily based on hunting, fishing, gathering molluscs and wild fruits, with water chestnut serving as the staple food. The rare presence of bone remains from domestic animals and a few cereal grains indicates access to food from a agro-pastoral economy. However, the absence of chaff remains, confirmed by phytolith analysis, suggests that cereal cultivation and processing did not occur on site. These findings, within the broader context of the cultural and environmental diversity of the northern Italian Neolithic, challenge the rigidity of concepts often used to describe Neolithization processes. The emerging picture is non-linear and complex, both chronologically and geographically, with local peculiarities that push to abandon a dichotomous view of foraging versus agricultural economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.