ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid machine learning predictions of high voltage polymeric insulator pollution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive approach for predicting pollution levels on high-voltage insulators in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia using five machine learning techniques integrated with the Improved Harris Hawks Optimizer (IHHO). The focus is on accurately estimating two key pollution metrics: Equivalent Salt Deposit Density and Normalized Salt Deposit Density. IHHO was used for hyperparameter optimization to guarantee that all proposed models function adequately. The prediction model is constructed from one year’s worth of environmental data, which includes temperature, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, elevation, dew point, precipitation, line voltage, and service period. Of all evaluated models, the hybrid IHHO-XGBoost model performed best, with an R2 of 0.993, a MAE of 0.0002, an RMSE of 0.00015, a MedAE of 3.563 × 10⁻5, an EV of 0.992, and an Adj R2 of 0.9923 with tenfold cross-validation. Model validation using Taylor diagram analysis confirmed a high degree of agreement between predicted and actual values. Furthermore, application of the SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanation) technique revealed that the most important predictors were wind speed, temperature, line voltage, and solar radiation. In addition, the results were compared to the results of other benchmark models to improve model explained accuracy and trustworthiness. Not only did the IHHO-XGBoost model best others in accuracy, it equally enhanced understanding of the environmental and operational factors that cause insulator contamination. These predictive capabilities support more effective condition monitoring and maintenance planning, ultimately contributing to improved reliability of electrical grid infrastructure in harsh environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.