Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315582›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Benchmarking genome assemblers for four bacterial models based on contiguity, correctness, and completeness.

Hanzel Rojas-Miranda, Vanessa Madrigal-Ly, Jose Arturo Molina-Mora

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanzel Rojas-MirandaFacultad de Microbiología y Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Vanessa Madrigal-LyUniversidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, Costa Rica.
Jose Arturo Molina-MoraFacultad de Microbiología y Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. jose.molinamora@ucr.ac.cr.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-4192

Funding

Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa Rica C1163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo genome assembly allows for the genome reconstruction of an organism without using a reference sequence. Assembly results depend on various sequencing technologies that generate data with differing fidelity, read lengths, and coverage levels, as well as on performance of a wide variety of algorithms. These attributes generate a diversity of assemblies for each single genome, which collectively defines the pan-assembly. In this study, we aimed to benchmark pan-assemblies of the prokaryotic models Brucella henselae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Xylella fastidiosa, using different attributes and their impact on metrics of the 3 C (contiguity, correctness, and completeness) criterion for selecting the best conditions for de novo genome assembly. Results showed that short-read assembly strategies presented higher accuracy with fewer errors (high correctness) and a high degree of completeness but lower contiguity due to fragmented assemblies. In contrast, long-read-based strategies showed high contiguity but lower completeness and accuracy. The hybrid strategy yielded the best overall results across all parameters by leveraging the strengths of both types of technology. Regarding assembly algorithms, Unicycler was the top assembler in 3 C metrics, using any of the short-read (compared to Megahit), long-read (compared to Canu), or hybrid strategies (compared to Wengan). Overall, the hybrid approach with Unicycler proved to be the best general approach for genome assembly of the four bacterial models. Finally, regarding coverage depth, increasing depth did not significantly affect assembly quality results if a minimum data level was maintained, indicating that high-quality assemblies can be achieved using moderate coverage levels. Jointly, the results of the pan-assembly provide working conditions for de novo genome assembly that can be applied to bacterial models of interest, guiding the selection of optimized experimental and bioinformatics conditions while reducing sequencing costs for generating high-quality sequences.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenome, BacterialAlgorithmsBenchmarkingComputational BiologyEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA3 C criterionBenchmarkingDe Novo genome assemblyPan-assemblyProkaryotes

Identifiers

PMID41315582
PMCPMC12669709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.