Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315575›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring community-based reporting of livestock abortions for rift valley fever and brucellosis surveillance in Uganda: a pilot study.

Abel W Walekhwa, Andrew J K Conlan, Stella Acaye Atim, Anna Rose Ademun, Emmanuel Hasahya, James L N Wood, Lawrence Mugisha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abel W WalekhwaDisease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. wabelwilson@gmail.com.
Andrew J K ConlanDisease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stella Acaye AtimNational Animal Disease Diagnostics and Epidemiology Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda.
Anna Rose AdemunNational Animal Disease Diagnostics and Epidemiology Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda.
Emmanuel HasahyaInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kampala, Uganda.
James L N WoodDisease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lawrence MugishaMakerere University College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) and brucellosis are serious zoonotic diseases with significant public health and economic consequences. In livestock, both diseases are associated with abortions that are not routinely reported as part of disease surveillance. We piloted a community-driven call centre initiative in Isingiro District, Uganda, from March to June 2023, aimed at facilitating the reporting of livestock abortions. The community call centre was promoted through stakeholder engagements, social media campaigns, and targeted sensitisation materials.Over three months, we received 53 alerts reporting 423 livestock abortions. We investigated 78% of these alerts and collected 200 serum samples. Of these, 184 samples were tested via ELISA for RVF virus antibodies (IgG and IgM), while all 200 were screened for anti-Brucella (IgG) antibodies using validated commercial kits. The proportion of aborting livestock testing positive for IgG antibodies to Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) was 38% [95% CI 29-47] in cattle, 33% [95% CI 14-61] in sheep, and 20% [95% CI 12-31] in goats. For IgM, sheep showed the highest proportion at 8% [95% CI 1-35], followed by cattle at 2% [95% CI 1-6]. Further analysis showed that cattle had a 2.9-fold elevated odds of RVF IgG seropositivity relative to sheep and goats (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.27-7.07, P = 0.014). The proportion of aborting livestock testing positive for IgG antibodies to brucellosis was 36% [95% CI 25-49] in goats and 16% [95% CI 11-23] in cattle, with no evidence of antibodies found in the sampled sheep.Our pilot study revealed high seropositivity to RVFV and brucellosis in cattle, sheep, and goats that had recently experienced abortions. This study demonstrates that early reporting of abortions by communities, followed by immediate collection of samples for diagnosis, could facilitate early detection and response to outbreaks. Furthermore, the response registered at the call centre by livestock owners has the potential for collaborative efforts to establish disease reporting and surveillance, thereby enabling more timely interventions.

Indexed as

Abortion, VeterinaryBrucellosisLivestockRift Valley FeverAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralBrucellaCattleFemaleGoatsPilot ProjectsPregnancyRift Valley fever virusSheepSheep DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralBrucellosisIsingiro districtLivestock abortionsRift valley feverUganda

Identifiers

PMID41315575
PMCPMC12663114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.