ArticleScientific reports2025
Mitigating crop modeling uncertainties through machine learning in drylands.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dry farming systems in drylands are sensitive to climate extremes, resulting in large yield variability and posing challenges to food security. Reliable crop modeling approaches are therefore essential, particularly under data-scarce conditions. This study evaluated the performance of the CSM-CERES-Wheat model across selected drylands in Iran using five gridded meteorological datasets. CFS and ERA5-Land provided daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation, while CHIRPS, IMERG and PERSIANN-CDR supplied only precipitation. A novel clustering-unbiasing-ensembling framework was applied using four machine learning (ML) algorithms. Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Random Forest outperformed other MLs, particularly for precipitation and minimum temperature. These top-performing MLs increased the average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency from 0.11-0.17 to 0.47 for precipitation and from 0.56-0.88 to 0.89-0.96 for temperature and solar radiation. Correcting variables individually had limited impact, whereas the TOTAL scenario-combining all corrected variables-improved yield and water stress simulations in ~ 60% of cases. Bootstrapping confirmed that the TOTAL scenario results were reliable, thereby supporting its transferability. Furthermore, ML-based TOTAL corrections outperformed classical unbiasing-ensembling algorithm. These findings underscore the value of advanced ML-based unbiasing-ensembling for enhancing climate data reliability in crop modeling, offering practical guidance to support susceptible dryland agricultural systems under extremes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.