ArticleScientific reports2025
FlameGuard: an AI-driven smart map for early detection and management of agricultural fires in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal transformer modeling of satellite fire detection confidence under climate variability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing incidence of agricultural fires in arid and semi-arid regions necessitates the development of advanced, scalable systems for early detection. This study presents FlameGuard, a geospatial AI framework developed to classify fire confidence levels using thermal satellite imagery-based data from the FIRMS dataset and multi-model predictive architectures. The framework integrates a spectral rule-based model-Spectral Algorithm for Fire Detection (SAFD)-with machine learning and deep learning classifiers. Baseline models demonstrated strong performance, with Random Forest achieving 97.41% accuracy ([Formula: see text]), XGBoost 98.20% ([Formula: see text]), and the Keras neural network 99.10% ([Formula: see text]). Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) further advanced this benchmark: Minos reached 100% accuracy (F1 = 0.993) and ViRanker 99.63% ([Formula: see text]). The ablation study confirmed that removing multi-sensor data (MODIS or VIIRS) or preprocessing components reduced performance by up to 3-4%, underscoring the synergy between satellite fusion and optimized pipelines. Ten-fold cross-validation validated the superior calibration and reliability of LLMs (Expected Calibration Error, ECE ≈ 0.031), with efficient training (≈78.5 s) and real-time inference ([Formula: see text] s). Comparative analysis revealed that FlameGuard surpassed NASA's FIRMS (75% accuracy, 3-6 h latency), MODIS fire alerts (70%, 4-6 h), and recent research (88-94%), achieving 99% accuracy, sub-hour detection latency, and IoT-ground-truth validation. All models were deployed within the FlameGuard smart map interface, enabling real-time visualization of fire risks, thermal anomalies, and confidence levels. The platform delivers interpretable, high-precision analytics to support proactive environmental monitoring and early response planning in fire-prone agricultural regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.