ArticleScientific reports2025
Demand forecasting of smart tourism integrating spatial metrology and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To enhance the dynamic perception and accuracy of tourism demand forecasting in smart tourism scenarios, this paper proposes a forecasting framework integrating a spatial econometric model and deep learning. This framework aims to address the limitations of traditional methods, namely insufficient spatial correlation modeling and weak interpretability of deep learning models. The model leverages spatial lag factors, spatial agglomeration indicators, and regional interaction behavior features. It constructs a geographical dependency structure based on spatial econometric methods, which is then embedded into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for joint forecasting. This design achieves a balance between time series modeling and spatial structure identification. In this study, three types of datasets are selected: tourist flow data of scenic spots in Beijing, online tourism behavior data from Ctrip, and GeoLife Global Positioning System Trajectory (GeoLife) data. A multi-dimensional experimental system covering 12 performance indicators is established. The results show that the optimized model achieves the following performance on the CityBrain Beijing Tourism Flow (CB-BJTF) dataset: mean absolute error (MAE) of 9.653, root mean square error (RMSE) of 12.118, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 14.538%, and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.