ArticleScientific reports2025
Discriminability of selected periods III‒IV elements in photon-counting computed tomography using a pixelated CdTe detector.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a new approach in photon-counting computed tomography (CT) for elemental discrimination in periods III and IV of the periodic table of elements, which have not been covered by conventional methods that rely on the K-absorption edge of the target element. The present method features a pixelated CdTe detector with positional sensitivity and energy resolution. The authors changed its energy threshold level to determine the worthiness of counting an energy deposition by an X-ray photon in a pixel rather than changing the tube voltage in accordance with the target element as in the conventional method. The differences between the images are visualised on a scatter plot against various threshold levels, which clearly separates iron (atomic number 26) and copper (atomic number 29) with minimal overlap after normalising the CT values of aluminium and air to 0 and -1000, respectively. The discriminability was quantified using the Bhattacharyya coefficient. This elemental discrimination method does not rely on the K-absorption edge of the target element and can therefore be broadly applied to other elements in non-destructive (non-invasive) industrial and biomedical CT inspections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.