Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315498›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biochar structure development during slow pyrolysis of pellets from barley straw and bran.

Maryna Zhylina, Denis Miroshnichenko, Andrii Melnykov, Valentina Stepanova, Kristine Lazdovica, Vjaceslavs Zemcenkovs, Vita Sterna, Jurijs Ozolins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maryna ZhylinaFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Riga Technical University, Paula Valdena Street 3, K-1, Riga, 1048, Latvia.
Denis MiroshnichenkoDepartment of Oil, Gas and Solid Fuel Processing Technology, National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute, 2, Kyrpychova str, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine. Denys.Miroshnychenko@khpi.edu.ua.
Andrii MelnykovScientific Research Institution "Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute of Ecological Problems (USRIEP)", 6, Evgeniya Yenin Str, Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine.
Valentina StepanovaFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Riga Technical University, Paula Valdena Street 3, K-1, Riga, 1048, Latvia.
Kristine LazdovicaInstitute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Riga Technical University, Paula Valdena St, 3/7, Riga, 1048, Latvia.
Vjaceslavs ZemcenkovsInstitute of Materials and Surface Engineering, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Riga Technical University, 7, P, Valdena Str, Riga, 1048, Latvia.
Vita SternaInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Stende Research Centre, Dizzemes, Dizstende, Libagu Parish, Talsu County, 3258, Latvia.
Jurijs OzolinsFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Riga Technical University, Paula Valdena Street 3, K-1, Riga, 1048, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant drive to incorporate circularity into products by finding cost-effective methods to recycle and reuse industrial waste. Agricultural biomass, a widespread waste stream, has great potential as a raw material for producing sorbents. However, the common practice of waste incineration negates this opportunity, as valuable resources are lost. This study aims to demonstrate that biomass pyrolysis can be used to create value-added products such as sorbents. Prior to pyrolysis, the optimal granulation process for integrating barley straw with bran was determined, yielding durable pellets composed of 90% barley straw and 10% bran (BSB). The study comparatively analyzed biochar obtained from BSB pellets, which were first pelletized and then subjected to pyrolysis at different temperatures (600, 700, and 800 °C) and holding times (1, 2, and 3 h). Key properties examined included biochar yield, carbon and nitrogen content, specific surface area, pore size distribution, and BET surface area. Pyrolysis was carried out at a constant heating rate of 5 °C·min⁻¹. Increasing the holding time and pyrolysis temperature positively influenced the surface area and broadened the pore size distribution of the resulting biochar. The most favorable results were observed for the sample obtained at 800 °C. The total pore volume of samples BSB800-2 h and BSB800-3 h was notably higher than that of BSB800-1 h. Prolonged holding time at the final temperature led to an expansion in pore size range and a corresponding increase in total pore volume and surface area.

Indexed as

CharcoalHordeumPyrolysisBiomassCarbonNitrogenPorosityTemperaturebiocharCarbonCharcoalNitrogenBiocharBiomassGranulationPore distributionPyrolysisSurface area

Identifiers

PMID41315498
PMCPMC12663580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.