ArticleScientific data2025
Packed Fruits and Vegetables Visual Classification and Segmentation Benchmark.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Packed Fruits and Vegetables Visual Classification and Segmentation Benchmark.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a novel dataset for visual recognition systems in retail automation, focusing specifically on fruits and vegetables. The dataset comprises 34 species and 65 varieties, featuring fairly balanced classes and including packed goods in plastic bags. We capture each sample from multiple viewpoints and provide additional annotations, such as object count and total weight. Furthermore, a subset of samples for each class includes segmentation masks. This dataset aims to overcome the limitations of current open-access datasets by providing a more comprehensive and diverse set of training data. A total of 72 annotators collected over 100,000 images of 370,000 objects across multiple shops and cities. Around 9,000 images have manual segmentation masks. To facilitate research in this area, we provide baseline results for zero-shot and supervised classification, instance segmentation, and object counting tasks. We also investigate the impact of packaging and background type on model performance. Ultimately, this dataset is designed to support the development of multitask models for visual recognition in offline retail settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.