Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315474›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improvement of college students' higher mathematics problem solving ability based on neural network and multiple regression model.

Tengyi Liu, Chuantao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tengyi LiuPeking University, Beijing, 100000, China.
Chuantao LiChina University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China. lct78@cugb.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims at the limitations of the evaluation of Problem Solving Ability (PSA) in college students' advanced mathematics problem-solving. It constructs a dual-dimensional evaluation system integrating cognitive dimensions (conceptual understanding, logical reasoning, etc.) and behavioral dimensions (time allocation, operation sequence, etc.) based on Piaget's cognitive theory and Schoenfeld's behavioral framework. Meanwhile, this study proposes a hybrid model of Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory-Regression (CNN-BiLSTM-Reg) optimized by Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO). Through a regression-guided attention mechanism, the model converted multiple regression coefficients into neural network weights, achieving a balance between interpretability and prediction accuracy (R²=0.95, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 5.32). The experimental results show that: The contribution rate of the cognitive dimension to PSA reaches 78.6% (β = 0.35 for logical reasoning). Ablation experiments verify that MVO optimization improves performance by 13.7%. The prediction error of the time dimension decreases from 6.85 at the beginning of the semester to 4.06 at the end of the semester. The improvement range of PSA in the intervention group is 3.3 times that in the control group. This study confirms the scientific nature of the integrated modeling of cognition and behavior, and is expected to provide a technical framework with both prediction function and teaching guidance value for intelligent education.

Indexed as

Advanced mathematicsBiLSTMCNNIntelligent educationMultiple regression analysis

Identifiers

PMID41315474
PMCPMC12663249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.