ArticleScientific reports2025
Improvement of college students' higher mathematics problem solving ability based on neural network and multiple regression model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims at the limitations of the evaluation of Problem Solving Ability (PSA) in college students' advanced mathematics problem-solving. It constructs a dual-dimensional evaluation system integrating cognitive dimensions (conceptual understanding, logical reasoning, etc.) and behavioral dimensions (time allocation, operation sequence, etc.) based on Piaget's cognitive theory and Schoenfeld's behavioral framework. Meanwhile, this study proposes a hybrid model of Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory-Regression (CNN-BiLSTM-Reg) optimized by Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO). Through a regression-guided attention mechanism, the model converted multiple regression coefficients into neural network weights, achieving a balance between interpretability and prediction accuracy (R²=0.95, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 5.32). The experimental results show that: The contribution rate of the cognitive dimension to PSA reaches 78.6% (β = 0.35 for logical reasoning). Ablation experiments verify that MVO optimization improves performance by 13.7%. The prediction error of the time dimension decreases from 6.85 at the beginning of the semester to 4.06 at the end of the semester. The improvement range of PSA in the intervention group is 3.3 times that in the control group. This study confirms the scientific nature of the integrated modeling of cognition and behavior, and is expected to provide a technical framework with both prediction function and teaching guidance value for intelligent education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.