ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of single and hybrid deep learning models for daily rainfall prediction in selected African cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the abundance of arable land in Africa, food insecurity persists as a significant challenge, largely due to increasingly unpredictable rainfall patterns driven by climate change. Accurate daily rainfall prediction is therefore critical for agricultural planning and food security. Deep learning (DL) offers powerful tools for modeling complex, nonlinear, and temporal dynamics in climate data. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparison of four single DL models: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), alongside three hybrid architectures (RNN + ANN, LSTM + ANN, and LSTM + RNN). These models were selected for their proven ability to capture both spatial and sequential dependencies in meteorological datasets, while the hybrid models were intended to leverage complementary strengths of the single learning models. Daily rainfall and associated meteorological variables (relative humidity, wind speed, and pressure) were obtained from NASA's MERRA-2 reanalysis, chosen for its long-term consistency, global coverage, and high spatial resolution. The dataset spans January 1, 1980, to December 31, 2024, and was preprocessed using standard scaling with an 80/20 train-validation split. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Huber loss, which provide robust measures of predictive accuracy and error sensitivity. Results reveal significant spatial variability in rainfall dynamics across the studied cities. Abuja and Libreville exhibited the highest variability, while Rabat showed consistently low and stable rainfall. Weak correlations among cities highlight the diversity of local rainfall regimes. Performance varied by location, but overall, single DL models, particularly RNN, outperformed hybrid models in most cities. The LSTM-ANN hybrid showed superior results only in Abuja (MSE = 50.0173, RMSE = 7.0723, MAE = 2.5242, Huber loss = 2.2478). Relative humidity emerged as the most influential predictor in most cities, whereas temporal persistence of rainfall dominated in Pretoria and Rabat. These findings underscore that while hybrid DL models can enhance performance in highly complex rainfall regimes, single models, especially RNN, remain more reliable and effective across diverse African climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.