ArticleScientific reports2025
Classifying the tumor immune microenvironment in cervical cancer based on nuclear cytoplasmic consistent genes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment options for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer (CC) remain limited, highlighting the urgent need for effective molecular biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. This study investigates nuclear-cytoplasmic consistent genes (NCCGs) in CC and other epithelial-derived malignancies, exploring their potential in molecular subtyping, prognosis evaluation, and therapeutic response prediction. NCCGs were identified using single-cell sequencing and single-nucleus RNA sequencing data. Through Cox regression and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, TCGA-CESC cohort were stratified into high-risk (HRG) and low-risk (LRG) groups. Pan-cancer analysis of 14 TCGA epithelial-derived malignancies, including BLCA and BRCA, validated the classification capability and prognostic relevance of NCCGs. Clinical utility in predicting chemotherapy and immunotherapy responses was assessed using GSE168009 and IMvigor210CoreBiologies cohorts. NCCGs effectively stratified CC cohort into HRG and LRG. LRG demonstrated significantly better survival (HR = 3.24, 95% CI 1.57-6.7) and higher immune scores, including elevated CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.