Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315440›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Human settlement water security in Northern Xinjiang China based on DPSIR model.

Haoyuan Guo, Hanru Zhou, Yanlong Guo, Jie Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haoyuan GuoSchool of Architecture and Art, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 203106, China.
Hanru ZhouSocial Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China.
Yanlong GuoSocial Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China. 20106@ahu.edu.cn.
Jie HuangPsychology Department, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

Funding

Industry-university Cooperative Education Project of Ministry of Education of China 2407154838Supply and Demand Matching Employment Education Project of Ministry of Education of China 2024092412435;2024011303919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water resource ecological security is a key foundation for ensuring human survival and maintaining ecosystem stability. A comprehensive evaluation index system is developed using the 'driving force-pressure-state-impact-response' (DPSIR) paradigm to examine the state of regional water ecological security. Entropy weight TOPSIS was used to determine the weights of each index, and the spatial differentiation characteristics and temporal and spatial deduction characteristics were analyzed. According to the research results, the weight coefficients obtained from the DPSIR mathematical model reveal a clear stratification of spatial differentiation features. From 2014 to 2023, the ecological water environment in the northern border areas showed an overall trend of early (2014-2017) increase, followed by decline (2018-2020), and then recovery or secondary increase (2020-2023), indicating the existence of spatiotemporal fluctuation patterns. Regional ecological carrying capacity essentially illustrates that the tendency of development is low in the northeast and strong in the southwest. Tacheng has the highest ecology load carrying capacity, with an average value of 0.478. The top three water resources carrying capacities are Tacheng, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture and Urumqi.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalWater SupplyChinaEcosystemHumansDifferentiation in spaceDPSIR principleNorthern borderSpatiotemporal deductionTOPSISWater environment

Identifiers

PMID41315440
PMCPMC12663311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.