Observational studyScientific reports2025
Development and validation of an interpretable predictive machine learning model for successful weaning of continuous renal replacement therapy.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction model for successful liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury: development and temporal validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Discrepancies between declared and real practices of continuous renal replacement therapy for septic acute kidney injury in French intensive care units.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a vital intervention for critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury, yet no standardized criteria exist to determine the optimal time for its discontinuation. We developed and validated machine learning models to predict successful CRRT weaning, defined as survival without any form of renal replacement therapy for at least seven days after discontinuation. This retrospective multicenter study used data from two French university hospitals and the publicly available MIMIC-IV critical care database. Predictive variables were selected from routinely collected clinical and biological data to ensure real-world applicability. Models were trained on the Rouen cohort and externally validated on the Rennes and MIMIC-IV cohorts. Among the tested algorithms, the random forest model achieved the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) in the training cohort, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90) in the Rennes cohort, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78) in the MIMIC cohort. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a robust and interpretable prediction model that relies solely on routinely available data and has potential for integration into clinical workflows to support CRRT weaning decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.