ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on location optimization and application of the gob-side entry retaining by roof cutting in close-distance coal seams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic study and control of coal pillar deformation and failure in gob-side roadways with extra-thick seams and hard roof.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on the support of roadways with different roof cutting angles in gob-side entry retaining.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on surrounding rock control technology of roof cutting and pressure relieving for roadside filling in gob-side entry retaining of large mining height panel.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Disaster causing mechanism and monitoring of dynamic and static load coupling of deep multi layer hard roof.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared to traditional long-wall mining, the gob-side entry retaining by roof-cutting (GERRC) technology reduces the amount of entry excavation by 50%, and recovers the previously wasted coal pillar resources, which has obvious superiority in mining efficiency and economic benefits. In response to the problem of reasonable entry location of the GERRC in close-distance coal seams, this paper takes the 9105 Working face in Longmenta Coal Mine as the engineering background and conducts an in-depth study by using methods such as theoretical analysis, numerical simulation and field tests. Firstly, the structural characteristics of the overburden rock for GERRC in the close-distance coal seam are analyzed, based on which a method for determining the reasonable location of the GERRC in close-distance coal seams is proposed; secondly, a mechanical model for load transfer and rock mass damage of the upper coal seam floor was established to analyze the floor damage characteristics and stress distribution law, forming the theoretical analysis of the reasonable entry location; Finally, the optimal entry location (22.5 m from the center of the upper remaining coal pillar) was used for field test of GERRC at the 9105 Working face of Longmenta Coal Mine. It has achieved good on-site application results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.