ArticleScientific reports2025
The brain activation on upper extremity motor control tasks in different forces levels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor control is a critical process for muscle contraction initiated by nerve impulses governed by the motor cortex, which is vital for performing activities of daily living. The purpose of this study is to investigate brain activation in upper extremity motor control tasks in regulating the pushing force. Eighteen healthy young adults were asked to perform upper extremity motor control tasks, and recorded the hemodynamic signals using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and robotic arms. Two types of movement-static and dynamic-and three different task difficulties based on different force levels were used as force-regulating upper extremity motor control tasks. The hemodynamic response was collected in the primary motor cortex (M1), premotor cortex (PMC), supplementary motor area (SMA), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). The results showed a decrease in HbO for PFC was greater in the static relative to dynamic movement. Moreover, contralateral (c) M1, ipsilateral (i) PFC, and PMC have a significant increment in HbO mean compared to task difficulty. These findings indicate that the upper-extremity force and movement rely on separate cortical circuits: brain activation increases with difficulty in the cM1, PMC, and iPFC, whereas only the PFC distinguishes static from dynamic movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.