ArticleScientific reports2025
Equitable colorectal cancer screening implementation framework via a modified Delphi Consensus for Romanian healthcare.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a predominant cause of cancer-related mortality on a global scale. Screening for early detection plays a crucial role in significantly reducing both incidence and mortality rates. However, screening uptake varies widely across regions due to disparities in healthcare resources and implementation of screening programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate various potential strategies for implementing an effective colorectal cancer screening program that enhances adherence. This program should be feasible and appropriate, considering the demographic characteristics, geographical distribution, and logistical factors, including human and material resources, of medical facilities at the national level in Romania. A multidisciplinary panel was convened using a modified Delphi process (two survey rounds and a consensus meeting in early 2022) to develop a harmonized CRC screening framework tailored to diverse healthcare settings. Clinicians and allied professionals from 19 countries (Europe, Asia, and Africa) contributed to the consensus recommendations for average-risk individuals. The panel advised that primary care physicians should play a central role in CRC risk assessment and patient engagement and endorsed initiating screening at age 45 and continuing to 75, with selective extension up to 85 for healthy, willing individuals. To improve participation, we recommended region-specific screening strategies that accommodate local resources and demographics and emphasized a patient-centered approach offering multiple modalities (colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical testing, CT colonography), emphasizing that the most effective test is one that patients are willing to complete. Finally, the study group deemed implementing a centralized system for screening invitations, result tracking, and patient recall essential. This consensus guideline provides a scalable model to enhance screening adherence and reduce CRC mortality through early detection and prevention. This framework is developed for the Romanian healthcare context, informed by international professional input but tailored to local healthcare infrastructure and estimated population needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.