ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatiotemporal analysis of Escherichia coli membrane permeabilization and uptake kinetics induced by a single microbubble cavitation event.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A single cavitation microbubble can transiently disrupt the cellular membrane, providing a chemical-free, targeted drug delivery mechanism. Here, we investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane permeabilization in an Escherichia coli (E. coli) monolayer exposed to a single cavitation event. Using high-resolution fluorescence microscopy and propidium iodide (PI) uptake as a marker of membrane disruption, we tracked the response of 5565 individual cells around the center of the cavitation event over timescales from microseconds to minutes and spatial scales from 1 to 165 µm. PI uptake rates exhibited a strong spatial dependence, with cells closer to the cavitation center showing rapid and extensive permeabilization. A modified Goldman equation describing PI concentrations inside and outside the cells was used and related to the spatiotemporal measurements of fluorescence intensity. The model accurately captured the first-order PI uptake kinetics, which resulted in saturated fluorescence intensity profiles. Additionally, the model predicted an exponential decay of permeability post-cavitation, implicitly suggesting that pore-resealing dynamics were taking place. Membrane permeability decreased with distance as 1/r, with a characteristic decay time of approximately 3.4 min. Our model thus predicts cell damage induced by a single cavitation event in both space and time. In the present case, where the cavitation bubble reached maximum radius of 29.7 µm, we found that at a distance of 11 µm from the cavitation center, ~ 50% of cell membranes are damaged and permeable to PI, but a pore-resealing mechanism reduces this damage to ~ 1% after 10 min. Our results are consistent with existing sonoporation studies and offer novel insights for optimizing cavitation-assisted drug delivery and biofilm disruption strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.