ArticleScientific reports2025
The usage of artificial Intelligence-empowered text analysis model with convolutional neural network in english reading.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing application of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, deep learning models have offered new solutions for personalized reading instruction. This study addresses the core issue of insufficient personalization in high school English reading instruction by systematically applying the Text Convolutional Neural Network (Text CNN) model in real classroom settings for the first time. A teaching-assistive framework is developed, integrating dynamic content recommendation with real-time feedback. Using multi-scale feature extraction and an attention mechanism based on Text CNN, the model automatically classifies reading materials, extracts key terms, and delivers personalized resources. A comparative experiment was conducted in a high school with 60 students, divided into an experimental group and a control group. The results showed that the experimental group, assisted by the Text CNN tool, improved their average reading comprehension scores from 66.2 to 79.6, outperforming the control group's 70.3. The model achieved classification accuracies of 93.5% and 94.2% for science and education texts, respectively, while reducing teachers' grading workload by 70%. However, this study was validated on a limited dataset of 2,000 texts, and the model's performance on unstructured texts (e.g., social media posts or legal documents) remains to be explored. Overall, this study provides empirical evidence for applying Text CNN in English instruction and lays a theoretical and practical foundation for developing and optimizing intelligent educational tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.