Trial reportScientific reports2025
Safety and efficacy of niosomal and conventional tranexamic acid/niacinamide vs. hydroquinone creams in melasma: A randomized, double-blind, case-controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melasma is a common hyperpigmentary skin disorder. Because of its high prevalence and serious complications, including negative psychiatric effects, early diagnosis and treatment would be essential. This randomized, double-blind, case-controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy of niosomal tranexamic acid (TXA) 2%/niacinamide (NCA) 2% cream and conventional TXA 5%/NCA 4% cream with topical hydroquinone (HQ) 4% cream as a gold standard in melasma patients. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A received niosomal TXA/NCA cream, Group B received conventional TXA/NCA cream, and Group C received HQ cream for three months. Each patient attended five dermatologist visits to evaluate clinical efficacy. All treatment groups showed a considerable reduction in melanin index and modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) scores, as well as a notable improvement in patients' quality of life. Although both niosomal TXA/NCA cream and conventional TXA/NCA cream were as effective as HQ cream in management of melasma, adverse reactions and relapse were observed in HQ group. Niosomal or conventional TXA/NCA creams are as effective as HQ 4% cream and due to less serious adverse reactions they would be better choices than HQ-containing preparations in hyperpigmentary disorders. Clinical Trial Registration No.: IRCT20220609055116N1 (Approval date: 07/23/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.