ArticleNature communications2025
Expanding the utility of variant effect predictions with phenotype-specific models.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeNovoSeer:a deep learning framework for pathogenicity prediction of De novo mutations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Decoding variants of uncertain significance in systemic autoinflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Transcription-based identification of uncharacterized genes in the human immune response.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for genomic variant prediction: advances, challenges, and future directions.GigaScience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current methods for variant effect prediction do not differentiate between pathogenic variants resulting in different disease outcomes and are restricted in application due to a focus on variants with a single molecular consequence. We have developed Variant-to-Phenotype (V2P), a multi-task, multi-output machine learning model to predict variant pathogenicity conditioned on top-level Human Phenotype Ontology disease phenotypes (n = 23) for single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions throughout the human genome. V2P leverages a unique approach for the modeling of variant effect that incorporates resultant disease phenotypes as output and during training to improve the quality of variant disease phenotype and effect predictions, simultaneously. We describe the architecture, training strategy, and biological features contributing to V2P's output, revealing initial characteristics underlying the relationship between disease genotype and phenotype. Moreover, we demonstrate the benefit of incorporating disease phenotypes for variant effect predictions by comparing V2P with several variant effect predictors across various high-quality evaluation datasets from manually curated databases and functional assays. Finally, we examine how V2P's predictions result in the successful identification of pathogenic variants in real and simulated patient sequencing data, outperforming other tested methods in initial comparisons. V2P offers a complete mapping of human genetic variants to disease-phenotypes, offering a uniquely conditioned set of variant effect characterizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.