Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315329›Full record

ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2025

A strategic approach to multi-omics literature retrieval in next generation mammalian cell bioprocessing.

Eva Price, Duygu Dikicioglu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eva PriceDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Duygu DikiciogluDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. d.dikicioglu@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W009420/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific literature is being published at an exponential rate, including in the field of mammalian cell bioprocessing. At the same time, the research landscape is becoming more diverse, with the emergence of multiple specialised subfields. This rise in information availability as well as broadening of research fields has a direct impact on ease of information retrieval. While this growth offers valuable insights, it also makes information retrieval more complex. Developing effective literature search queries has become increasingly challenging. This work discusses the process of literature query search refinement and the nuances of maintaining search sensitivity and specificity in the context of multi-omics research for next-generation mammalian cell bioprocessing.

Indexed as

GenomicsInformation Storage and RetrievalAnimalsHumansMammalsMultiomicsProteomics

Identifiers

PMID41315329
PMCPMC12774885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.