Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315314›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Development of daily downscaled, bias-corrected CMIP6 climate datasets for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in South Asia.

Aniruddha Saha, Manoj Kumar Jain, Pranita Joshi, Subhankar Das, Naimesh Singh Rawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aniruddha SahaDepartment of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4532-7507
Manoj Kumar JainDepartment of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India. manoj.jain@hy.iitr.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3582-9527
Pranita JoshiDepartment of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9280-3381
Subhankar DasDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-9343
Naimesh Singh RawatDepartment of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8744-5575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential evapotranspiration plays a crucial role in hydrological analysis. Therefore, reliable projection of potential evapotranspiration and/or reference evapotranspiration (ETo) at the local scale under various climate change scenario is essential. To achieve this, climate datasets from various General Circulation Models must be downscaled and bias corrected to enhance their accuracy. In this study, we developed daily bias-corrected datasets of ETo at 0.25° spatial resolution. We used outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) for the historical and four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. The datasets include temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, and relative humidity from 12 different models at various spatial scales for South Asia. The bias correction was performed using the Quantile-Mapping approach. The resulting bias-corrected climate variables (dataset available in repository) were subsequently used to estimate historical and future ETo over South Asia. A significant difference was observed between the original and bias-corrected datasets when evaluated against the ERA-5 reanalysis observation data. Penman-Monteith method was utilized for ETo estimation to reduce the uncertainties of temperature-based methods.

Identifiers

PMID41315314
PMCPMC12663131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.