ArticleNature communications2025
Interferometric imaging of the reversible rhodopsin dynamics in the living rat eye.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On the physiological processes underlying optoretinography [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision begins with conformational changes in photopigments. The associated electrical signature, called an early receptor potential (ERP), in rods is limited to contribution of a small fraction of rhodopsin embedded in plasma membrane. Optoretinography (ORG), using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography, detects nanoscale deformations of retinal cells associated with physiological processes. In previous ORG studies, focused primarily on cones, deformation related to ERP was largely obscured by osmotic swelling and long stimuli. Here, we demonstrate a robust electromechanical signature of photoisomerization in rods. A green flash induces a sub-millisecond contraction of the outer segments by hundreds of nanometers, while a subsequent UV flash reverts the activated molecules, producing an opposite response of similar magnitude. ORG surpasses the sensitivity of electrical methods by integrating the response across all the discs in rod outer segments and it opens the door to fundamental studies of visual transduction in-vivo and to more specific clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.