Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315312›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Contribution of amygdala to dynamic model arbitration under uncertainty.

Jae Hyung Woo, Vincent D Costa, Craig A Taswell, Kathryn M Rothenhoefer, Bruno B Averbeck, Alireza Soltani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reduced Pavlovian Value Updating Alters Decision-Making in Sign-Trackers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jae Hyung WooDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Vincent D CostaDivision of Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5412-8945
Craig A TaswellLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-6973
Kathryn M RothenhoeferDivision of Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, Emory National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bruno B AverbeckLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-8565
Alireza SoltaniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. alireza.soltani@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4386-8486

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
CRCNS Research Proposal: Cortico-amygdalar substrates of adaptive learningR01DA047870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Alicia Izquierdo, Alireza Soltani · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic uncertainty in the reward environment requires the brain to run multiple models simultaneously to predict outcomes from preceding cues or actions. For example, reward outcomes may be linked to specific stimuli and actions, corresponding to stimulus- and action-based learning. But how does the brain arbitrate between such models? Here, we combined multiple computational approaches to quantify concurrent learning in male monkeys performing tasks with different levels of uncertainty about the model of the environment. By comparing behavior in control monkeys and monkeys with bilateral lesions to the amygdala or ventral striatum, we found evidence for a dynamic, competitive interaction between stimulus-based and action-based learning, and for a distinct role of the amygdala in model arbitration. We demonstrated that the amygdala adjusts the initial balance between the two learning systems and is essential for updating arbitration according to the correct model, which in turn alters the interaction between arbitration and learning that governs the time course of learning and choice behavior. In contrast, VS lesions lead to an overall reduction in stimulus-value signals. This role of the amygdala reconciles existing contradictory observations and provides testable predictions for future studies into circuit-level mechanisms of flexible learning and choice under uncertainty.

Indexed as

AmygdalaLearningAnimalsChoice BehaviorMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalRewardUncertaintyVentral Striatum

Identifiers

PMID41315312
PMCPMC12753643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.