Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41315302›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Preserving and enhancing cultural heritage through art design using feature pyramid network optimized by modified builder optimization algorithm.

Xing Fu, Navid Razmjooy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xing FuSchool of Arts, University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, 300222, China. zsf1234789@edu.yadx.
Navid RazmjooyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. navid.razmjooy@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultural heritage continues to be endangered by environmental, social, and political issues requiring new digital preservation methods. This paper proposes a deep learning framework consisting of an Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) and an Modified Builder Optimization Algorithm (MBOA) whose purpose is to classify, restore, and synthesize culturally significant artwork. Using the WikiArt dataset, the model represents the cultural styles of many artistic traditions by fully utilizing FPN's multi-scale architecture and identifying both fine scale textures as well as global stylistic semantics. The MBOA optimizes hyperparameters through an innovative bio-inspired search strategy, which improves convergence and model performance and improves training efficiency. The framework achieves style classification accuracy of 96.7% in terms of preference, a PSNR of 32.41 dB and SSIM of 0.937 for restoration, and an Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) score of 14.3 for generation, therefore outperforming state-of-the-art CNNs and generative models. The results illustrated the framework's powerful reconstruction capabilities in restoring degraded works of art, or generating new works inspired by cultural aesthetics. By combining a Feature Pyramid Network, Modified Builder Optimization Algorithm, and Neural Style Transfer, this work further expands the capabilities and role of Generative AI for use in digital preservation. This approach supports not only archival fidelity and quality but forms a creative interaction, enhancing the capabilities of networks and reinterpreting global heritage assets in the digital age as a scalable tool for museums, teachers, and cultural institutions.

Indexed as

AI-generated artArtistic style classificationCultural heritageDigital restorationFeature pyramid networkModified builder optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41315302
PMCPMC12663437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.